2020年6月15日，歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）發布消息，應歐盟委員會要求，動物飼料添加劑和產品（FEEDAP）研究小組就戊糖片球菌（Pediococcus pentosaceus）（DSM 16244）作為所有動物物種飼料添加劑的授權延期申請發表科學意見。
申請人已提供證據證明目前市場上的此種添加劑符合現有授權條件。經過評估，專家組得出結論，在授權使用條件下，戊糖片球菌作為添加劑對所有動物物種、消費者和環境仍然是安全的。在授權續期的情況下，無需對添加劑的有效性進行評估。
部分原文報道如下：
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed （FEEDAP ） was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 as a technological additive for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There was no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumer and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. The additive was not irritant to skin and eyes but considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. The present application for renewal of the authorisation did not include a proposal for amending or supplementing the conditions of the original authorisation that would have an impact on the efficacy of the additive. Therefore, there was no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
本文由食品伙伴網食品資訊中心編輯，供網友參考，歡迎轉載，轉載請注明出處！有任何疑問，請聯系news@foodmate.net。
日期：2020-06-18
申請人已提供證據證明目前市場上的此種添加劑符合現有授權條件。經過評估，專家組得出結論，在授權使用條件下，戊糖片球菌作為添加劑對所有動物物種、消費者和環境仍然是安全的。在授權續期的情況下，無需對添加劑的有效性進行評估。
部分原文報道如下：
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed （FEEDAP ） was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of Pediococcus pentosaceus DSM 16244 as a technological additive for all animal species. The applicant has provided evidence that the additive currently in the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. There was no new evidence that would lead the FEEDAP Panel to reconsider its previous conclusions. Thus, the Panel concluded that the additive remains safe for all animal species, consumer and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. The additive was not irritant to skin and eyes but considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. The present application for renewal of the authorisation did not include a proposal for amending or supplementing the conditions of the original authorisation that would have an impact on the efficacy of the additive. Therefore, there was no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
本文由食品伙伴網食品資訊中心編輯，供網友參考，歡迎轉載，轉載請注明出處！有任何疑問，請聯系news@foodmate.net。
日期：2020-06-18
