2022年11月30日，歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）就審查吡丙醚（pyriproxyfen）的現有最大殘留水平發布意見。
根據歐盟委員會第396/2005號法規第12章，歐盟食品安全局審查了吡丙醚的最大殘留限量。根據對現有數據的評估，提出了MRL提案，并進行了消費者風險評估。雖然沒有發現對消費者的明顯風險，但缺少監管框架要求的一些信息。因此，消費者風險評估僅被認為是指示性的，EFSA提出的一些MRL建議仍需風險管理者進一步考慮。部分原文報道如下：
According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for the pesticide active substance pyriproxyfen. To assess the occurrence of pyriproxyfen residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the MRLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission as well as the import tolerances and European authorisations reported by Member States and the UK (including the supporting residues data). based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Although no apparent risk to consumers was identified, some information required by the regulatory framework was missing. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only and most MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers.
根據歐盟委員會第396/2005號法規第12章，歐盟食品安全局審查了吡丙醚的最大殘留限量。根據對現有數據的評估，提出了MRL提案，并進行了消費者風險評估。雖然沒有發現對消費者的明顯風險，但缺少監管框架要求的一些信息。因此，消費者風險評估僅被認為是指示性的，EFSA提出的一些MRL建議仍需風險管理者進一步考慮。部分原文報道如下：
According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, EFSA has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for the pesticide active substance pyriproxyfen. To assess the occurrence of pyriproxyfen residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, the MRLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission as well as the import tolerances and European authorisations reported by Member States and the UK (including the supporting residues data). based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Although no apparent risk to consumers was identified, some information required by the regulatory framework was missing. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only and most MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers.
