據歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）消息，2021年1月21日，歐盟食品安全局就活性物質解淀粉芽孢桿菌（Bacillus amyloliquefaciens）菌株QST 713的農藥風險評估發布同行評審。
經過評估，將解淀粉芽孢桿菌菌株QST 713作為殺菌劑用在草莓（田間和溫室用途）和葡萄（田間用途）的基礎上，歐盟食品安全局提出了適用于監管風險評估的可靠端點，列出了監管框架要求的缺失信息，問題已經確定。部分原文報道如下：
The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Germany, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Denmark, for the pesticide active substance Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain QST 713, formerly Bacillus subtilis strain QST 713, are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain QST 713 as a fungicide on strawberry (field and greenhouse uses) and grapes (field use). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
本文由食品伙伴網食品資訊中心編輯，供網友參考，歡迎轉載，轉載請注明出處！有任何疑問，請聯系news@foodmate.net。
日期：2021-01-22
經過評估，將解淀粉芽孢桿菌菌株QST 713作為殺菌劑用在草莓（田間和溫室用途）和葡萄（田間用途）的基礎上，歐盟食品安全局提出了適用于監管風險評估的可靠端點，列出了監管框架要求的缺失信息，問題已經確定。部分原文報道如下：
The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Germany, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Denmark, for the pesticide active substance Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain QST 713, formerly Bacillus subtilis strain QST 713, are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain QST 713 as a fungicide on strawberry (field and greenhouse uses) and grapes (field use). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
本文由食品伙伴網食品資訊中心編輯，供網友參考，歡迎轉載，轉載請注明出處！有任何疑問，請聯系news@foodmate.net。
日期：2021-01-22
